北京地区西妥昔单抗注射液不良反应调研分析

刘红, 白羽, 史蕤, 王啸洋, 张艳华, 张本静

中国药学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (16) : 1395-1398.

PDF(911 KB)
PDF(911 KB)
中国药学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (16) : 1395-1398. DOI: 10.11669/cpj.2022.16.012
论著

北京地区西妥昔单抗注射液不良反应调研分析

  • 刘红1, 白羽1, 史蕤1, 王啸洋1, 张艳华1, 张本静2
作者信息 +

Investigation and Analysis of Adverse Reactions of Cetuximab Injection in Beijing

  • LIU Hong1, BAI Yu1, SHI Rui1, WANG Xiao-yang1, ZHANG Yan-hua1, ZHANG Ben-jing2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 西妥昔单抗是重组嵌合型单克隆抗体和表皮生长因子受体抑制剂上市已超过15年,但是仍缺乏上市后不良反应(adverse drugreaction, ADR)监测系统性评估。方法 收集2016年1月1日至2020年12月31日北京市药品不良反应监测数据库中涉及怀疑药品西妥昔单抗的ADR报告,通过SPSS 22.0软件对数据进行统计分析。结果 共485例ADR报告纳入研究,男女比例为1.56∶1。ADR主要涉及系统-器官为皮肤及其附件,其次为全身性损害、胃肠系统及血液系统等。深静脉血栓占比1.03%,高于说明书中偶见ADR频率。过敏反应多在用药后2 h内发生,以皮肤反应为主。严重ADR占比43.51%,患者的性别、年龄与ADR的严重程度和发生时间没有明显相关性(P>0.05)。报告人员缺乏对新的ADR判断,死亡病例记录不详实,死亡病例中肺栓塞和间质性肺炎不良事件可能与西妥昔单抗相关。结论 西妥昔单抗治疗发生严重ADR占比较高,老年患者与中青年患者相比无明显差异。深静脉血栓发生频率高于说明书中描述的频率。由于缺乏详实的病例信息,无法明确西妥昔单抗与死亡病例的因果关系,需关注发生肺栓塞和间质性肺炎不良事件的患者,需加强上报人员药物警戒相关培训,提高上报信息的准确性和完整性,为患者安全用药提供科学依据。

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Cetuximab is a recombinant chimeric monoclonal antibody and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor, which has been more than 15 years sincethe market, but there is still a lack of systematic post market assessment of adverse drug reaction(ADR). METHODS Collected the ADR reports of the suspected drug cetuximab in the Beijing Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Database from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2020. The data statistical analysis was performed through SPSS 22.0 software. RESULTS A total of 485 ADRs were included in the study. The male to female ratio of ADRs were 1.56∶1. ADR mainly affected by the system-organ classes were the skin and appendages disorders, followed by body as whole-general disorders, gastrointestinal system disorders and blood system disorders.Deepveinthrombosis(DVT) accountsfor 1.03%, which was higher than the occasional ADR in the instructions. Allergic reactions mostly occurred with in 2 hours after medication, mainly skin reactions. Besides, severe ADR accounted for 43.51%. There was no correlation between characteristics of patients and ADRs(P>0.05). The reporters lacked judgment on the new ADRs, and the records of death cases were not detailed.Pulmonary embolismand interstitial pneumonia may be related to cetuximab, which may result in the death. CONCLUSION Severe ADR accounts for a relatively high proportion, and there is no significant difference between elderly patients and young and middle-aged patients. The frequency of DVT is higher than the frequency described in the instructions. Due to the lack of detailed case information, it is impossible to clarify the causal relationship between cetuximab and death. More attention should be paid to patients with ADR of pulmonary embolismand interstitial pneumonia.Inaddition, there is an urgent necessary to strengthen the pharmacovigilance training of the reporting personnel, improve the accuracy and completeness of the reported information,which would provide a theoretical basis for the safe medication of patients.

关键词

副反应 / 药物警戒 / 药物不良事件 / 药物监测 / 合理用药

Key words

side reaction / pharmacovigilance / adversedrugevent / drug monitoring / rational administration of drugs

引用本文

导出引用
刘红, 白羽, 史蕤, 王啸洋, 张艳华, 张本静. 北京地区西妥昔单抗注射液不良反应调研分析[J]. 中国药学杂志, 2022, 57(16): 1395-1398 https://doi.org/10.11669/cpj.2022.16.012
LIU Hong, BAI Yu, SHI Rui, WANG Xiao-yang, ZHANG Yan-hua, ZHANG Ben-jing. Investigation and Analysis of Adverse Reactions of Cetuximab Injection in Beijing[J]. Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, 2022, 57(16): 1395-1398 https://doi.org/10.11669/cpj.2022.16.012
中图分类号: R969   

参考文献

[1] SUNG H, FERLAY J, SIEGEL R L, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3):209-249.
[2] VAN C E, KOHNE C H, HITRE E, et al. Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 360(14):1408-1417.
[3] FORNASIER G, FRANCESCON S, BALDO P. An update of efficacy and safety of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: a narrative review[J]. Adv Ther, 2018, 35(10):1497-1509.
[4] SORICH M J, WIESE M D, ROWLAND A, et al. Extended RAS mutations and anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody survival benefit in metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials[J]. Ann Oncol, 2015, 26(1):13-21.
[5] VERMORKEN J B, TRIGO J, HITT R, et al. Open-label, uncontrolled, multicenter phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cetuximab as a single agent in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who failed to respond to platinum-based therapy[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25(16):2171-2177.
[6] CHEN W, ZHENG R, BAADE P D, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2016, 66(2):115-132.
[7] IWAMOTO T, OKAMOTO A, ISHINAGA H, et al. A novel approach to predict cetuximab-induced hypersensitivity reaction: detection of drug-specific IgE on basophils[J]. Cancer Med, 2016, 5(6):1004-1012.
[8] MEYER H J, WIENKE A, SUROV A. Incidental pulmonary embolism in oncologic patients-a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2021, 29(3):1293-1302.
[9] SUN X L, ZHU Y, FENG Y F, et al. Analysis of anti-tumor targeted drugs induced lung disease [J]. Chin Pharm J(中国药学杂志), 2018, 53(16):1425-1430.
PDF(911 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/